Yesterday, I introduced the Stream enhancement in Java 16, which can be converted to List directly through toList() .
It mainly involves the following conversion methods:
list.stream().toList();
list.stream().collect(Collectors.toList());
list.stream().collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList());
Then, I saw some netizens commented: What is the difference between Stream.toList()
and Collectors.toList()
? Which one performs better?
The difference in processing results is actually said in the previous article and video:
-
Stream.toList()
The returned List is an immutable List and cannot be added, deleted or modified -
Collectors.toList()
Returns an ordinary List, which can be added, deleted, or modified -
Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()
The returned List is an immutable List and cannot be added, deleted or modified
As for performance, let's test it today to see which one performs better.
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.All)
@Fork(1)
@State(Scope.Thread)
@Warmup(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000)
public class BenchmarkStreamToList {
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList();
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> collectorsToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList();
}
}
Results report:
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 24.422 ± 0.268 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 22.784 ± 0.599 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 31.779 ± 1.732 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.045 ± 0.006 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.062 ± 0.035 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.040 ± 0.028 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 445 0.046 ± 0.002 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.039 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.041 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.073 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 0.102 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 460 0.044 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.042 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.044 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.046 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.047 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.051 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 655 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.030 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.031 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.032 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.033 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.035 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.043 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.045 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op
From the report we can see:
- Throughput:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
- Average time:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
- p0.9999 time consuming:
streamToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
>collectorsToList
- Cold start time:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
Therefore, Stream.toList()
performs better than Collectors.toList()
and Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()
in every respect.
If you encounter difficulties in the learning process? You can join our high-quality technical exchange group , participate in exchanges and discussions, and learn and progress better!
This article is included in the "New Java Features Column" that I am serializing. This series should be written in the form of e-books. If you want to immerse yourself in reading and learning, you can visit the Web version: https://www.didispace.com/java -features/
To zoom in some more data, try:
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList();
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> collectorsToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList();
}
Results report:
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 2.186 ± 0.162 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 2.184 ± 0.042 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 3.538 ± 0.058 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.426 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.469 ± 0.016 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.293 ± 0.008 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 58 0.448 ± 0.049 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.414 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.422 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.458 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.560 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 60 0.458 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.447 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.455 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.471 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.482 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 78 0.293 ± 0.012 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.277 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.284 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.309 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.377 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.474 ± 0.133 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.493 ± 0.099 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.325 ± 0.056 s/op
From the report we can see
- Throughput:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
- Average time:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
- p0.9999 time consuming:
streamToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
>collectorsToList
- Cold start time:
streamToList
>collectorsToList
>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
So, even if the elements in the set increase, Stream.toList()
still performs better than the method under Collectors
in every way.
Well, today's sharing is here, have you learned it?
This video: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV16Y411F7Pm/
Welcome to my public account: Programmer DD. Learn about cutting-edge industry news for the first time, share in-depth technical dry goods, and obtain high-quality learning resources
**粗体** _斜体_ [链接](http://example.com) `代码` - 列表 > 引用
。你还可以使用@
来通知其他用户。