在了解Spring AOP的实现之前,先了解一些Spring AOP的相关概念
AOP的相关概念
在使用Spring进行AOP相关的编程时,我们经常使用Advice (通知), PointCut (切点), Advisor (通知器)来实现我们需要的功能。
Advice
Advice是AOP联盟定义的一个接口,定义了我们可以在切点做些什么,即我们希望织入的增强逻辑,为切面增强提供织入的入口。在Spring中,Advice作为一个统一的接口,Spring在Advice的基础上定义了具体的通知类型,比如,
- BeforeAdvice: 前置增强接口,在目标方法调用之前回调。
- AfterAdvice : 后置增强接口,在目标方法调用结束并成功返回时回调。
- ThrowAdvice : 在抛出异常时回调。
- Interceptor: 表示一个通用的拦截器,可以在方法的调用前后进行增强。
- DynamicIntroductionAdvice: 与上面的Advice和Interceptor不同,DynamicIntroductionAdvice不对方法进行增强,而是动态的引入新的接口实现。我们可以为目标类添加一个接口的实现(原来目标类未实现某个接口),那么通过DynamicIntroductionAdvice增强可以为目标类创建实现某接口的代理。
Pointcut
Pointcut 决定Advice可以作用于哪些连接点,即通过Pointcut我们可以定义需要增强的方法的集合。这些方法的集合可以通过Pointcut中定义的规则来选取,当方法符合Pointcut定义的规则时,返回true。这些规则可是正则表达式,也可以是字符串的匹配等。
Spring定义了Pointcut的接口,Pointcut接口中定义了用于获取类过滤器和方法匹配器的抽象方法。
public interface Pointcut {
/**
* Return the ClassFilter for this pointcut.
* @return the ClassFilter (never {@code null})
*/
ClassFilter getClassFilter();
/**
* Return the MethodMatcher for this pointcut.
* @return the MethodMatcher (never {@code null})
*/
MethodMatcher getMethodMatcher();
/**
* Canonical Pointcut instance that always matches.
*/
Pointcut TRUE = TruePointcut.INSTANCE;
}
但是有了类过滤器和方法匹配器,我们还需要知道如何使用类过滤器和方法匹配器,因此在实现Pointcut的同时也需要实现MethodMatcher。MethodMatcher定义了matches方法,即用于规则匹配的方法。
public interface MethodMatcher {
/**
* Perform static checking whether the given method matches.
* <p>If this returns {@code false} or if the {@link #isRuntime()}
* method returns {@code false}, no runtime check (i.e. no
* {@link #matches(java.lang.reflect.Method, Class, Object[])} call)
* will be made.
* @param method the candidate method
* @param targetClass the target class
* @return whether or not this method matches statically
*/
boolean matches(Method method, Class<?> targetClass);
/**
* Is this MethodMatcher dynamic, that is, must a final call be made on the
* {@link #matches(java.lang.reflect.Method, Class, Object[])} method at
* runtime even if the 2-arg matches method returns {@code true}?
* <p>Can be invoked when an AOP proxy is created, and need not be invoked
* again before each method invocation,
* @return whether or not a runtime match via the 3-arg
* {@link #matches(java.lang.reflect.Method, Class, Object[])} method
* is required if static matching passed
*/
boolean isRuntime();
/**
* Check whether there a runtime (dynamic) match for this method,
* which must have matched statically.
* <p>This method is invoked only if the 2-arg matches method returns
* {@code true} for the given method and target class, and if the
* {@link #isRuntime()} method returns {@code true}. Invoked
* immediately before potential running of the advice, after any
* advice earlier in the advice chain has run.
* @param method the candidate method
* @param targetClass the target class
* @param args arguments to the method
* @return whether there's a runtime match
* @see MethodMatcher#matches(Method, Class)
*/
boolean matches(Method method, Class<?> targetClass, Object... args);
/**
* Canonical instance that matches all methods.
*/
MethodMatcher TRUE = TrueMethodMatcher.INSTANCE;
}
下图给出了Spring中一些Pointcut的继承关系,可以看到具体的实现都集成了Pointcut接口和MethodMatcher接口。
Advisor
前面介绍了Advice的增强逻辑,Pointcut定义了方法的集合,但是哪些方法使用什么样的增强逻辑依旧没有关联起来,Advisor就是将Advice和Pointcut结合起来,通过Advisor,可以定义在某个Pointcut连接点上使用哪个Advice。
Spring 提供了一个DefaultPointcutAdvisor, 在DefaultPointcutAdvisor中有两个属性,分别为advice和pointcut用来配置Advice 和Pointcut。 其实现如下所示。
public class DefaultPointcutAdvisor extends AbstractGenericPointcutAdvisor implements Serializable {
private Pointcut pointcut = Pointcut.TRUE;
/**
* Create an empty DefaultPointcutAdvisor.
* <p>Advice must be set before use using setter methods.
* Pointcut will normally be set also, but defaults to {@code Pointcut.TRUE}.
*/
public DefaultPointcutAdvisor() {
}
/**
* Create a DefaultPointcutAdvisor that matches all methods.
* <p>{@code Pointcut.TRUE} will be used as Pointcut.
* @param advice the Advice to use
*/
public DefaultPointcutAdvisor(Advice advice) {
this(Pointcut.TRUE, advice);
}
/**
* Create a DefaultPointcutAdvisor, specifying Pointcut and Advice.
* @param pointcut the Pointcut targeting the Advice
* @param advice the Advice to run when Pointcut matches
*/
public DefaultPointcutAdvisor(Pointcut pointcut, Advice advice) {
this.pointcut = pointcut;
setAdvice(advice);
}
/**
* Specify the pointcut targeting the advice.
* <p>Default is {@code Pointcut.TRUE}.
* @see #setAdvice
*/
public void setPointcut(@Nullable Pointcut pointcut) {
this.pointcut = (pointcut != null ? pointcut : Pointcut.TRUE);
}
@Override
public Pointcut getPointcut() {
return this.pointcut;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return getClass().getName() + ": pointcut [" + getPointcut() + "]; advice [" + getAdvice() + "]";
}
}
Spring AOP的实现
前面已经介绍了Spring AOP的相关概念,但是Spring AOP是如何对方法的调用进行拦截的呢?下面就Spring AOP的实现进行分析。
同样以Spring中的单元测试开始Spring AOP的实现分析。
通过以下代码开始Spring AOP的实现分析。
@Test
public void testProxyFactory() {
TestBean target = new TestBean();
ProxyFactory pf = new ProxyFactory(target);
NopInterceptor nop = new NopInterceptor();
CountingBeforeAdvice cba = new CountingBeforeAdvice();
Advisor advisor = new DefaultPointcutAdvisor(cba);
pf.addAdvice(nop);
pf.addAdvisor(advisor);
ITestBean proxied = (ITestBean) pf.getProxy();
proxied.setAge(5);
assertThat(cba.getCalls()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(nop.getCount()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(pf.removeAdvisor(advisor)).isTrue();
assertThat(proxied.getAge()).isEqualTo(5);
assertThat(cba.getCalls()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(nop.getCount()).isEqualTo(2);
}
上述的代码中创建了一个TestBean,NopInterceptor, CountingBeforeAdvice对象,并使用TestBean初始化了ProxyFactory,CountingBeforeAdvice对象初始化DefaultPointcutAdvisor,同时将NopInterceptorDefaultPointcutAdvisor添加到ProxyFactory中。可以看到上述的代码中没有指明Pointcut, 也就意味着使用了默认的Pointcut.TRUE, 即对所有的方法都进行增强。
首先来看一下ProxyFactory的继承关系。
从上往下看,首先是TargetClassAware, 定义了一个getTargetClass()方法用来获取目标对象的Class,Advised继承了该接口,Advised接口定义了获取和设置AOP 代理工厂(Aop proxy factory)配置的方法,具体代码如下:
public interface Advised extends TargetClassAware {
boolean isFrozen();
boolean isProxyTargetClass();
Class<?>[] getProxiedInterfaces();
boolean isInterfaceProxied(Class<?> intf);
void setTargetSource(TargetSource targetSource);
TargetSource getTargetSource();
void setExposeProxy(boolean exposeProxy);
boolean isExposeProxy();
void setPreFiltered(boolean preFiltered);
boolean isPreFiltered();
Advisor[] getAdvisors();
default int getAdvisorCount() {
return getAdvisors().length;
}
void addAdvisor(Advisor advisor) throws AopConfigException;
void addAdvisor(int pos, Advisor advisor) throws AopConfigException;
boolean removeAdvisor(Advisor advisor);
void removeAdvisor(int index) throws AopConfigException;
int indexOf(Advisor advisor);
boolean replaceAdvisor(Advisor a, Advisor b) throws AopConfigException;
void addAdvice(Advice advice) throws AopConfigException;
void addAdvice(int pos, Advice advice) throws AopConfigException;
boolean removeAdvice(Advice advice);
int indexOf(Advice advice);
String toProxyConfigString();
}
而ProxyConfig则保存了AOP 代理工厂的部分属性,可以看成是一个数据基类,如下:
public class ProxyConfig implements Serializable {
...
private boolean proxyTargetClass = false;
private boolean optimize = false;
boolean opaque = false;
boolean exposeProxy = false;
private boolean frozen = false;
...
}
AdvisedSupport 继承了ProxyConfig同时实现了Advised接口,封装了AOP对Advice和Advisor的相关操作。
/** The AdvisorChainFactory to use. */
AdvisorChainFactory advisorChainFactory = new DefaultAdvisorChainFactory();
/** Cache with Method as key and advisor chain List as value. */
private transient Map<MethodCacheKey, List<Object>> methodCache;
/**
* Interfaces to be implemented by the proxy. Held in List to keep the order
* of registration, to create JDK proxy with specified order of interfaces.
*/
private List<Class<?>> interfaces = new ArrayList<>();
/**
* List of Advisors. If an Advice is added, it will be wrapped
* in an Advisor before being added to this List.
*/
private List<Advisor> advisors = new ArrayList<>();
ProxyCreatorSupport 则提供了设置ProxyFactory和创建代理对象的方法,创建的具体的代理对象则交给具体的ProxyFactory完成。
最下面的则是三个具体的ProxyFactory的实现,分别为:
- ProxyFactory,可以在IOC容器中使用声明式配置AOP。
- ProxyFactoryBean,需要编程式的使用AOP
- AspectProxyFactory, 对于使用AspectJ的AOP应用,集成了Spring和AspectJ。
了解了ProxyFactory的继承关系后,继续往下看,我们已经知道了具体的代理的对象的创建交给具体的ProxyFactory。
我们主要关注下面用于获取代理对象的这行代码:
ITestBean proxied = (ITestBean) pf.getProxy();
ProxyFactory 的getProxy的实现如下:
public Object getProxy() {
return createAopProxy().getProxy();
}
getProxy()调用ProxyCreatorSupport的createAopProxy()用于创建AopProxy。
protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() {
if (!this.active) {
activate();
}
return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this);
}
createAopProxy()先通过getAopProxyFactory()获取AopProxyFactory。getAopProxyFactory()直接返回一个DefaultAopProxyFactory的对象,然后调用DefaultAopProxyFactory的createAopProxy()方法创建具体的AopProxy,并传入this指针,即ProxyFactory对象本身,因为ProxyFactory继承了AdvisedSupport。
public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
if (!NativeDetector.inNativeImage() &&
(config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config))) {
Class<?> targetClass = config.getTargetClass();
if (targetClass == null) {
throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +
"Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");
}
if (targetClass.isInterface() || Proxy.isProxyClass(targetClass)) {
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
return new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(config);
}
else {
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
}
private boolean hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(AdvisedSupport config) {
Class<?>[] ifcs = config.getProxiedInterfaces();
return (ifcs.length == 0 || (ifcs.length == 1 && SpringProxy.class.isAssignableFrom(ifcs[0])));
}
- config.isOptimize():表示是否使用了优化策略,配置的属性optimize值决定;
- config.isProxyTargetClass():表示是否是代理目标类,配置的属性proxy-target-class值决定;
- hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces():就是在判断代理的对象是否有实现接口
当代理的是接口时,则使用JdkDynamicAopProxy,否则使用ObjenesisCglibAopProxy()。
JdkDynamicAopProxy保存了config和需要代理的接口。
public JdkDynamicAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
Assert.notNull(config, "AdvisedSupport must not be null");
if (config.getAdvisorCount() == 0 && config.getTargetSource() == AdvisedSupport.EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE) {
throw new AopConfigException("No advisors and no TargetSource specified");
}
this.advised = config;
this.proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true);
findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(this.proxiedInterfaces);
}
当advised没有实现SpringProxy,Advised, DecoratingProxy 接口AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces()会分别添加这三个接口。
到这里AopProxyFactory就实例化完成了。继续看getProxy()做了什么。
public Object getProxy() {
return getProxy(ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader());
}
public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
}
return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, this.proxiedInterfaces, this);
}
通过将classLoader, proxiedInterfaces和this传入到newProxyInstance中去创建了目标对象的代理对象。JdkDynamicAopProxy实现了InvocationHandler接口,因此可以将this指针传进去创建代理对象。
代理对象创建完成之后,当我们调用代理对象的方法时,就会回调JdkDynamicAopProxy的invoke()方法。到这里我们只看见了代理对象的创建,依旧没有看到怎么对方法进行增强的逻辑,因为对代码进行增强的实现就在invoke()方法里面。
接下来看一下invoke()方法。
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
Object oldProxy = null;
boolean setProxyContext = false;
TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
Object target = null;
try {
if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
// The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself.
return equals(args[0]);
}
else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
// The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself.
return hashCode();
}
else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) {
// There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config.
return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised);
}
else if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
// Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config...
return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args);
}
Object retVal;
if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
// Make invocation available if necessary.
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
setProxyContext = true;
}
// Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target,
// in case it comes from a pool.
target = targetSource.getTarget();
Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null);
// Get the interception chain for this method.
List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
// Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct
// reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation.
if (chain.isEmpty()) {
// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly
// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does
// nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying.
Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse);
}
else {
// We need to create a method invocation...
MethodInvocation invocation =
new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
// Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain.
retVal = invocation.proceed();
}
// Massage return value if necessary.
Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
if (retVal != null && retVal == target &&
returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) &&
!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
// Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method
// is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets
// a reference to itself in another returned object.
retVal = proxy;
}
else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) {
throw new AopInvocationException(
"Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method);
}
return retVal;
}
finally {
if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
// Must have come from TargetSource.
targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
if (setProxyContext) {
// Restore old proxy.
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
}
}
}
invoke()的入参为代理对象,调用的方法,以及调用方法的参数。invoke()方首先检查method是不是equal,hashCode方法,以及declaringClass是不是DecoratingProxy,是不是需要将proxy设置到AopContext里面。做完这一系列的检查之后,通过getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice()获取Interceptor和Advice保存到chain中,如果chain为空,表示没有interceptor和Advice,则直接通过反射的方法调用目标方法,invokeJoinpointUsingReflection()方法封装反射调用的逻辑。如果非空,则构造一个ReflectiveMethodInvocation对象,ReflectiveMethodInvocation对象的proceed方法封装了Advice方法的增强逻辑。
先来看一下getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice()的实现:
public List<Object> getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
MethodCacheKey cacheKey = new MethodCacheKey(method);
List<Object> cached = this.methodCache.get(cacheKey);
if (cached == null) {
cached = this.advisorChainFactory.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(
this, method, targetClass);
this.methodCache.put(cacheKey, cached);
}
return cached;
}
先将method封装成MethodCacheKey,然后尝试从缓存中获取这个key对应的缓存,如果没有,则通过advisorChainFactory.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice()去获取,这里的advisorChainFactory的默认实现是DefaultAdvisorChainFactory,看一下getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice()的实现。
public List<Object> getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(
Advised config, Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
// This is somewhat tricky... We have to process introductions first,
// but we need to preserve order in the ultimate list.
AdvisorAdapterRegistry registry = GlobalAdvisorAdapterRegistry.getInstance();
Advisor[] advisors = config.getAdvisors();
List<Object> interceptorList = new ArrayList<>(advisors.length);
Class<?> actualClass = (targetClass != null ? targetClass : method.getDeclaringClass());
Boolean hasIntroductions = null;
for (Advisor advisor : advisors) {
if (advisor instanceof PointcutAdvisor) {
// Add it conditionally.
PointcutAdvisor pointcutAdvisor = (PointcutAdvisor) advisor;
if (config.isPreFiltered() || pointcutAdvisor.getPointcut().getClassFilter().matches(actualClass)) {
MethodMatcher mm = pointcutAdvisor.getPointcut().getMethodMatcher();
boolean match;
if (mm instanceof IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) {
if (hasIntroductions == null) {
hasIntroductions = hasMatchingIntroductions(advisors, actualClass);
}
match = ((IntroductionAwareMethodMatcher) mm).matches(method, actualClass, hasIntroductions);
}
else {
match = mm.matches(method, actualClass);
}
if (match) {
MethodInterceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
if (mm.isRuntime()) {
// Creating a new object instance in the getInterceptors() method
// isn't a problem as we normally cache created chains.
for (MethodInterceptor interceptor : interceptors) {
interceptorList.add(new InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher(interceptor, mm));
}
}
else {
interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
}
}
}
}
else if (advisor instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) {
IntroductionAdvisor ia = (IntroductionAdvisor) advisor;
if (config.isPreFiltered() || ia.getClassFilter().matches(actualClass)) {
Interceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
}
}
else {
Interceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
}
}
return interceptorList;
}
上述的代码首先通过GlobalAdvisorAdapterRegistry.getInstance()获取了DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry的实例,DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry注册了三种Adviced的适配器,用于将Advice适配成Interceptor。
public DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry() {
registerAdvisorAdapter(new MethodBeforeAdviceAdapter());
registerAdvisorAdapter(new AfterReturningAdviceAdapter());
registerAdvisorAdapter(new ThrowsAdviceAdapter());
}
然后对我们添加的Advisor逐个遍历,首先判断是不是PointcutAdvisor,然后判断是不是IntroductionAdvisor,如果都不是则认为是Interceptor。如果当前的advisor是PointcutAdvisor,则先判断是不是提前过滤过了,或者class是否符合ClassFilter中定义的规则,如果进一步判断MethodMatcher的类型以及method是否匹配。无论是PointcutAdvisor,IntroductionAdvisor还是Interceptor, 最后都通过 registry.getInterceptors()方法对advisor进行适配,将advisor对象通过响应的适配器适配成MethodInterceptor的一个实例。具体的实现如下所示:
public MethodInterceptor[] getInterceptors(Advisor advisor) throws UnknownAdviceTypeException {
List<MethodInterceptor> interceptors = new ArrayList<>(3);
Advice advice = advisor.getAdvice();
if (advice instanceof MethodInterceptor) {
interceptors.add((MethodInterceptor) advice);
}
for (AdvisorAdapter adapter : this.adapters) {
if (adapter.supportsAdvice(advice)) {
interceptors.add(adapter.getInterceptor(advisor));
}
}
if (interceptors.isEmpty()) {
throw new UnknownAdviceTypeException(advisor.getAdvice());
}
return interceptors.toArray(new MethodInterceptor[0]);
}
看一下其中一个adapter的实现。
class MethodBeforeAdviceAdapter implements AdvisorAdapter, Serializable {
@Override
public boolean supportsAdvice(Advice advice) {
return (advice instanceof MethodBeforeAdvice);
}
@Override
public MethodInterceptor getInterceptor(Advisor advisor) {
MethodBeforeAdvice advice = (MethodBeforeAdvice) advisor.getAdvice();
return new MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor(advice);
}
}
public class MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, BeforeAdvice, Serializable {
private final MethodBeforeAdvice advice;
public MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor(MethodBeforeAdvice advice) {
Assert.notNull(advice, "Advice must not be null");
this.advice = advice;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation mi) throws Throwable {
this.advice.before(mi.getMethod(), mi.getArguments(), mi.getThis());
return mi.proceed();
}
}
可以看到对于BeforeAdvice最终被是配成了MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor,实现了MethodInterceptor接口,其中invoke方法就是后面拦截器链的入口。
继续看proceed的实现。
public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
// We start with an index of -1 and increment early.
if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
return invokeJoinpoint();
}
Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
// Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have
// been evaluated and found to match.
InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
(InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
Class<?> targetClass = (this.targetClass != null ? this.targetClass : this.method.getDeclaringClass());
if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, targetClass, this.arguments)) {
return dm.interceptor.invoke(this);
}
else {
// Dynamic matching failed.
// Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain.
return proceed();
}
}
else {
// It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have
// been evaluated statically before this object was constructed.
return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
}
}
从索引为-1开始递增,如果所有的Interceptor或者Advice都调用完毕,则通过反射调用目标函数。如果当前的interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice是InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher的实例,则先通matches方法进行匹配,如果匹配成功,则调用interceptor的invoke方法,否则跳过,如果不是InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher的实例则时表示是一个interceptor,也直接调用invoke方法。
结合上述的MethodInterceptor的invoke方法,可以看到所有的Advice和interceptor串成了一条拦截器链,从头开始,通过matches方法进行匹配,匹配成功则进行增强,否则继续往下查找,直到尾部,调用目标方法,整个过程就是对目标方法的增强过程,也是AOP的实现原理。
总结
本文以ProxyFactory为例分析了Spring AOP的实现,其实现原理大致可以分为三个部分:
- Advice, Pointcut,Advisor的实现
- 目标对象代理对象的生成。
- 对Advice进行适配,并组装成一条拦截器链,通过拦截器链对目标方法进行增强。
**粗体** _斜体_ [链接](http://example.com) `代码` - 列表 > 引用
。你还可以使用@
来通知其他用户。