Perhaps because of the epidemic, most people are in the home office mode or idle charging state, so in the past two years, there have been many Internet "melon eaters".
As long as there is a new event, or as long as the headline news is exposed on the Internet, the people who eat melons can quickly gather, and even "eat melons across the circle", at the same time, they will not be interested in the hot event itself and everything related to it. Make a "God" review.
Not to mention, sometimes the reviews of "melon-eating people" are really in place.
I believe everyone still remembers that in early January this year, the author of the well-known tool library Faker.js "deleted the library and ran away" caused a "shock" in the open source circle. At that time, in addition to many developers in the circle commenting on it, it also attracted Many industry passers-by are watching.
(Related reading: The author of Faker.js "deletes the library and runs away" leads to "shock" in the open source circle: the open source project is now controlled by the community https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000041307795 )
As for the author of Faker.js, not only did he receive "polarized" comments from "melon eaters" in the industry: those who supported him thought he did a good job and should "reject prostitution"; those who criticized thought it was a bit of a Selfish.
All in all, the Faker.js author has since been "delisted" by the tool library community. Although this incident has also aroused the industry's in-depth thinking on open source culture, the consequences caused by the "impulse" of the developer as a contributor are not worth the gain.
In recent years, reports about programmers "deleting libraries and running away" have occurred at home and abroad, but not everyone can be "crusade" on the Internet like the author above. Deleting the library and running away" was a momentary pleasure and fell into "jail".
Recently, the topic of "Baidu programmer was sentenced to 9 months in prison for deleting the library" has attracted the attention of the majority of netizens due to the relevant popularity.
It is understood that from August to September 2020, an employee of Baidu Company deleted and modified the data in the database of Baidu Company's visualization project program because he was dissatisfied with the company's sending other employees to take over the project, which then constituted the crime of "destroying computer information systems". In March last year, he was arrested by the public security organs and brought to justice.
In March this year, the Haidian District People's Court made a first-instance judgment (sentenced to 9 months in prison, suspended for 1 year), and then the Baidu employee who was suspected of being involved in the case filed an appeal, asking the second-instance court to give a lighter sentence. In the end, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
According to the ruling information exposed on the Internet, the Baidu employee suspected of being involved in the case is Jin XX, who has been working in Baidu since graduation, and his main work is platform testing and program development.
Because of his dissatisfaction with the company sending other employees to take over the project, Jin XX logged into the company's intranet server through his mobile phone at home, and deleted, locked, and modified the project table in the visual project program database two or three times, destroying the data of the platform. and violated the law.
Seeing such an operation, not only the developers in the circle are puzzled by this kind of thing, but the netizens who eat melons outside the circle also feel that their fists are hard.
We also saw comments from netizens who eat melons below this topic. Let's feel it:
"This kind of thing doesn't happen once or twice..."
"It's so easy to get in?..."
"Ignorance and legal rights protection is the right way"
"The approach is too extreme, and rational solution to the problem is the right way"
"It's not worth it, gold shines wherever it is"
"The approach is too extreme, and the problem is solved rationally"
......
Among them, many comments expressed that the problem should be solved in a rational way, and they "deleted the library and ran away" on a whim. Not only did they fail to solve the problem, but they also stepped on the red line of the law, which is indeed very irrational.
Seeing this, we can't help but think of a similar report on February 10 this year. It was also a 29-year-old JD programmer who "deleted all the system codes of the upcoming JD Daojia platform without the permission of the company." Sentenced to 10 months.
Like the Baidu programmer Jin XX this time, both of them constituted the crime of "destroying computer information systems" because they deleted the database without permission, and were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment.
So, here is the comment of the netizen who eats melons again - "Wherever gold is, it will shine".
Indeed, I believe that for any young and ambitious programmer, it is necessary to "open the pattern" in daily work, handle daily affairs in strict accordance with relevant system specifications, and discuss rationally when encountering problems, so as to avoid going to extremes. , although this is only a small step for itself, it is a big step for the development of the entire industry, what do you think?
**粗体** _斜体_ [链接](http://example.com) `代码` - 列表 > 引用
。你还可以使用@
来通知其他用户。