PyTorch之分布式操作Barrier

PyTorch之分布式操作Barrier

原始文档：https://www.yuque.com/lart/ug...

关于 barrier 的概念

关于 barrier 这个概念可以参考 Wiki 中的介绍：同步屏障(Barrier)是并行计算中的一种同步方法。对于一群进程或线程，程序中的一个同步屏障意味着任何线程/进程执行到此后必须等待，直到所有线程/进程都到达此点才可继续执行下文。

这里要注意，barrier 这一方法并不是 pytorch 独有的，这是并行计算中的一个基本概念，其他的并行计算的场景下也可能会涉及这一概念和操作。本文主要讨论 pytorch 中的情况。

torch.distributed.barrier(group=None, async_op=False, device_ids=None)

Synchronizes all processes.

This collective blocks processes until the whole group enters this function, if async_op is False, or if async work handle is called on wait().

Parameters
group (ProcessGroup, optional) – The process group to work on. If None, the default process group will be used.
async_op (bool, optional) – Whether this op should be an async op
device_ids ([int], optional) – List of device/GPU ids. Valid only for NCCL backend.

Returns
Async work handle, if async_op is set to True. None, if not async_op or if not part of the group

在多卡训练的时候，由于不同的 GPU 往往被设定在不同的进程中，有时候为了在单独的进程中执行一些任务，但是又同时希望限制其他进程的执行进度，就有了使用barrier的需求。
一个实际的场景是准备数据集：我们只需要在 0 号进程处理，其他进程没必要也执行这一任务，但是其他进程的后续工作却依赖准备好的数据。于是就需要在 0 号进程执行过程中阻塞其他的进程，使其进入等待状态。等到处理好之后，再一起放行。

这种需求下，一个典型的基于上下文管理器形式的构造如下：

# https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5/blob/7d56d451241e94cd9dbe4fcb9bfba0e92c6e0e23/utils/torch_utils.py#L29-L38

@contextmanager
def torch_distributed_zero_first(local_rank: int):
    """
    Decorator to make all processes in distributed training
    wait for each local_master to do something.
    """
    if local_rank not in [-1, 0]:
        dist.barrier(device_ids=[local_rank])
    yield
    if local_rank == 0:
        dist.barrier(device_ids=[0])

关于 barrier 的细节

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

import os
import time

import torch.distributed as dist
import torch.multiprocessing as mp


def ddp_test_v0(local_rank, word_size):
    # Initializes the distributed backend which will take care of sychronizing nodes/GPUs
    dist.init_process_group(backend="nccl", world_size=word_size, rank=local_rank)

    print("first before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    if local_rank != 0:
        dist.barrier()
    print("first after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("inter {}".format(local_rank))

    print("second before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    if local_rank == 0:
        dist.barrier()
    print("second after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("{} exit".format(local_rank))


def ddp_test_v1(local_rank, word_size):
    # Initializes the distributed backend which will take care of synchronizing nodes/GPUs
    dist.init_process_group(backend="nccl", world_size=word_size, rank=local_rank)

    if local_rank != 0:
        print("1 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        time.sleep(5)
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        dist.barrier()
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    else:
        print("0 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        dist.barrier()
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("{} exit".format(local_rank))


def main():
    world_size = 2
    os.environ["MASTER_ADDR"] = "127.0.0.1"
    os.environ["MASTER_PORT"] = "29500"
    mp.spawn(ddp_test_v0, args=(world_size,), nprocs=world_size, join=True)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

这里展示了两个例子，实际上在官方展示的 dist.barrier  之外显示了该方法的一个重要特性，就是其操作实际上是每一个进程内部都需要对应的执行同样的次数，才会对应的由阻塞变为正常运行。
先看第一个例子：

def ddp_test(local_rank, word_size):
    # Initializes the distributed backend which will take care of sychronizing nodes/GPUs
    dist.init_process_group(backend="nccl", world_size=word_size, rank=local_rank)

    print("first before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    if local_rank != 0:
        dist.barrier()
    print("first after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("inter {}".format(local_rank))

    print("second before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    if local_rank == 0:
        dist.barrier()
    print("second after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("{} exit".format(local_rank))

其输出是：

first before barrier1
first before barrier0


first after barrier0

inter 0
second before barrier0

second after barrier0

0 exit
first after barrier1

inter 1
second before barrier1

second after barrier1

1 exit

Process finished with exit code 0

可以看到，有几个细节：

• barrier  之前，所有的操作都是各 GPU 进程自己输出自己的。

  • 由于 local_rank=0  执行到自己可见的 barrier  中间会输出多个，而 local_rank=1  则只有一条 first before barrier1 。
• second before barrier0  之后，0 号执行到了属于自己的 barrier ，这回让使得其他进程不再阻塞，开始正常运行。由于中间操作的时间，所以先是 0 号输出自己的 second after barrier0  并随之退出，之后 1 号也接着开始输出自己的结果。

这里有一点值得注意，不同进程的 barrier  实际上是互相对应的，必须所有进程都执行一次barrier，才会重新放行正常前进。
对于第二段代码：

def ddp_test_v1(local_rank, word_size):
    # Initializes the distributed backend which will take care of sychronizing nodes/GPUs
    dist.init_process_group(backend="nccl", world_size=word_size, rank=local_rank)

    if local_rank != 0:
        print("1 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        time.sleep(5)
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        dist.barrier()
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    else:
        print("0 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        dist.barrier()
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("{} exit".format(local_rank))

则是有输出：

1 before barrier1
0 before barrier0


5.002117395401001
5.0021262168884281 after barrier1


0 after barrier0

0 after barrier0

0 after barrier0

0 exit
1 after barrier1

1 exit

Process finished with exit code 0

可以看到一个重要的点，就是这两处 print(time.time() - start)  的输出是基本一样的，不管前面延时多少， barrier  后面的时间都是按照最长到达并执行 barrier  的间隔时间来的。这个更体现了不同进程 barrier  之间的互相限制关系。而 0 到达自己的第二个 barrier  之后，会使得 1 号再次运行。但是此时 0 是先结束的。
另外，可以验证，如果某个编号对应的代码中的两个 barrier  之中的一个，那么另一个就会陷入无限等待之中。
例如：

def ddp_test_v1(local_rank, word_size):
    # Initializes the distributed backend which will take care of sychronizing nodes/GPUs
    dist.init_process_group(backend="nccl", world_size=word_size, rank=local_rank)

    if local_rank != 0:
        print("1 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        time.sleep(5)
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        # dist.barrier()
        print("1 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
    else:
        print("0 before barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        start = time.time()
        time.sleep(3)
        dist.barrier()
        print(time.time() - start)
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))
        dist.barrier()
        print("0 after barrier{}\n".format(local_rank))

    print("{} exit".format(local_rank))

输出：

0 before barrier0
1 before barrier1


5.002458572387695
1 after barrier1

1 after barrier1

1 exit
5.002473831176758
0 after barrier0

0 after barrier0

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/lart/Coding/SODBetterProj/tools/dist_experiment_test.py", line 67, in <module>
    main()
  File "/home/lart/Coding/SODBetterProj/tools/dist_experiment_test.py", line 63, in main
    mp.spawn(ddp_test_v1, args=(world_size,), nprocs=world_size, join=True)
  File "/home/lart/miniconda3/envs/pt17/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 199, in spawn
    return start_processes(fn, args, nprocs, join, daemon, start_method='spawn')
  File "/home/lart/miniconda3/envs/pt17/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 157, in start_processes
    while not context.join():
  File "/home/lart/miniconda3/envs/pt17/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 75, in join
    ready = multiprocessing.connection.wait(
  File "/home/lart/miniconda3/envs/pt17/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/connection.py", line 931, in wait
    ready = selector.select(timeout)
  File "/home/lart/miniconda3/envs/pt17/lib/python3.8/selectors.py", line 415, in select
    fd_event_list = self._selector.poll(timeout)
KeyboardInterrupt

Process finished with exit code 137 (interrupted by signal 9: SIGKILL)

会在第二个 barrier  处无限等待下去。
这一特点在这个回答中也被提到了：

when a process encounters a barrier it will block the position of the barrier is not important (not all processes have to enter the same if-statement, for instance) a process is blocked by a barrier until all processes have encountered a barrier, upon which the barrier is lifted for all processes

https://stackoverflow.com/a/59766443

重要的参考资料

• 原创[PyTorch] DDP 系列

  • 第一篇：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/178402798
  • 第二篇：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/187610959
  • 第三篇：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/250471767

• PyTorch 单机多 GPU 训练方法与原理整理

  • https://github.com/jia-zhuang/pytorch-multi-gpu-training

• Pytorch 分布式训练（图示非常友好）

  • https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/76638962

• Distribution is all you need（丰富全面）

  • https://github.com/tczhangzhi/pytorch-distributed