在 Heroku 替代品之间做出决定

Platforms for Shipping Web Apps: Make it easier to deploy and run apps in the cloud. PaaS abstracts infrastructure management complexity.
Heroku and Its Alternatives:
- Render vs Heroku: Popular alternative with cheaper prices. Differs in having "services" instead of "applications", offers more compute options but with granularity. Render is often cheaper but has stability issues. It's SOC2 compliant and has first-party support for static sites and Cloudflare protection. Heroku has a long history of reliable service and more compliance certifications.
- Railway vs Heroku: Another alternative with per-unit pricing for compute. Has some similarities but differs in egress costs (varies wildly), DDoS protection (user needs to integrate), database handling (not a managed service), compliance (SOC2 Type I), and support for cron jobs.
- Fly.io vs Heroku: Runs on its own bare-metal servers. Has more compute options, is compliant for SOC2 Type II and offers HIPAA compliance path. Has basic DDoS protection and no fully managed database service.
Managed Cloud Options:
- Porter: Brings your own cloud, compatible with AWS, Azure, and GCP. Cheaper than traditional platforms as compute needs grow.
- Dokku: Open-source, self-hosted PaaS. Requires provisioning infrastructure and setup. Gives more application management once running.
- Cloud66: Helps bring your own infrastructure with a convenient management layer, works with multiple cloud providers.
Should You Stay on Heroku: If priority is developer experience, Heroku is hard to beat. It's well-known, supported, and has a long history of reliability and compliance options. Render is good for price and starting out. Railway may be better for migrating with known traffic levels. If reliability and developer experience are key, Heroku is still the way.