By David Buchanan on 11th May 2025:
- “Responsible” is a loaded term yet vague and non-specific.
- What’s responsible in a situation depends on vulnerability, vendors, and other stakeholders.
- “Coordinated Disclosure” is more neutral but still vague.
- When saying “responsible disclosure”, the follow-up should be “responsible to whom?”.
- “Coordinated disclosure” just replaces the question with “in coordination with whom?”.
- Prefers terms like “vendor-coordinated disclosure”, “maintainer-coordinated disclosure”, or “user-coordinated disclosure” (not mutually exclusive).
- User-coordinated disclosure may be a new name; consider a security researcher’s hypothetical announcement.
- In vendor-coordinated disclosure, a common thing is to include a deadline for full disclosure (between ~7 and ~180 days, no consensus on optimal).
- Disclosure policy and decision-making are nuanced; if someone uses “responsible disclosure”, ask for more specificity.
**粗体** _斜体_ [链接](http://example.com) `代码` - 列表 > 引用
。你还可以使用@
来通知其他用户。