如何在只有受保护或私有构造函数的类上调用 ::std::make_shared？

Question

我有这段代码不起作用，但我认为意图很明确：

testmakeshared.cpp

 #include <memory>

class A {
 public:
   static ::std::shared_ptr<A> create() {
      return ::std::make_shared<A>();
   }

 protected:
   A() {}
   A(const A &) = delete;
   const A &operator =(const A &) = delete;
};

::std::shared_ptr<A> foo()
{
   return A::create();
}

但是当我编译它时出现这个错误：

 g++ -std=c++0x -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -Wall testmakeshared.cpp
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:52:0,
                 from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/memory:86,
                 from testmakeshared.cpp:1:
testmakeshared.cpp: In constructor ‘std::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace<_Tp, _Alloc, _Lp>::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace(_Alloc) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator<A>, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:518:8:   instantiated from ‘std::__shared_count<_Lp>::__shared_count(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, _Tp*, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator<A>, _Args = {}, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:986:35:   instantiated from ‘std::__shared_ptr<_Tp, _Lp>::__shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator<A>, _Args = {}, _Tp = A, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:313:64:   instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr<_Tp>::shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator<A>, _Args = {}, _Tp = A]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:531:39:   instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator<A>, _Args = {}]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:547:42:   instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr<_Tp1> std::make_shared(_Args&& ...) [with _Tp = A, _Args = {}]’
testmakeshared.cpp:6:40:   instantiated from here
testmakeshared.cpp:10:8: error: ‘A::A()’ is protected
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:400:2: error: within this context

Compilation exited abnormally with code 1 at Tue Nov 15 07:32:58

这条消息基本上是说模板实例化堆栈中的一些随机方法从 ::std::make_shared 无法访问构造函数，因为它受到保护。

但我真的想同时使用 ::std::make_shared 并防止任何人制作一个 ::std::shared_ptr 没有指向的此类对象。有没有办法做到这一点？

原文由 Omnifarious 发布，翻译遵循 CC BY-SA 4.0 许可协议

Answer 1

这个答案 可能更好，而且我可能会接受。但我也想出了一个更丑陋的方法，但仍然让一切仍然是内联的，并且不需要派生类：

 #include <memory>
#include <string>

class A {
 protected:
   struct this_is_private;

 public:
   explicit A(const this_is_private &) {}
   A(const this_is_private &, ::std::string, int) {}

   template <typename... T>
   static ::std::shared_ptr<A> create(T &&...args) {
      return ::std::make_shared<A>(this_is_private{0},
                                   ::std::forward<T>(args)...);
   }

 protected:
   struct this_is_private {
       explicit this_is_private(int) {}
   };

   A(const A &) = delete;
   const A &operator =(const A &) = delete;
};

::std::shared_ptr<A> foo()
{
   return A::create();
}

::std::shared_ptr<A> bar()
{
   return A::create("George", 5);
}

::std::shared_ptr<A> errors()
{
   ::std::shared_ptr<A> retval;

   // Each of these assignments to retval properly generates errors.
   retval = A::create("George");
   retval = new A(A::this_is_private{0});
   return ::std::move(retval);
}

编辑 2017-01-06： 我对此进行了更改，以明确表示这个想法可以清楚而简单地扩展到接受参数的构造函数，因为其他人正在按照这些思路提供答案并且似乎对此感到困惑。

原文由 Omnifarious 发布，翻译遵循 CC BY-SA 3.0 许可协议

Answer 2

基于 CRTP 的解决方案允许对多个类进行分解，很容易启用并且适用于带参数的构造函数。它要求构造函数受到保护（不是私有的）。用法有点类似于 enable_shared_from_this 。它没有破坏 protected 关键字的缺点，即使用 ::make_unique 的类必须是朋友。灵感 来自 Mark Tolley 的回答。

执行：

 template <typename ClassWithProtectedCtor>
class enable_protected_make_unique
{
protected: // important, if public then equivalent to having the constructor public which is what we want to avoid!
    template <typename... Args>
    static std::unique_ptr<ClassWithProtectedCtor> make_unique(Args &&... args)
    {
        class make_unique_enabler : public ClassWithProtectedCtor
        {
        public:
            // it's from this line that comes the need to have the constructor protected, not private:
            make_unique_enabler(Args &&... args) : ClassWithProtectedCtor(std::forward<Args>(args)...) {}
        };
        return std::make_unique<make_unique_enabler>(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
    }
};

使用示例：

 class Factory;

class MyClassWithProtectedCtor : public enable_protected_make_unique<MyClassWithProtectedCtor>
{
friend Factory;
private:
    MyClassWithProtectedCtor(int a, double c) {};
}

class Factory
{
    std::unique_ptr<MyClassWithProtectedCtor> CreateMyClassWithProtectedCtor(int a, double c)
    {
        return MyClassWithProtectedCtor::make_unique(a, c);
    }
}

您可以将 unique 替换为 shared ，或者将两者结合在同一个“启用程序”类中。

免责声明：我没有在生产代码中测试过，可能存在缺点（例如在提到类型 MyClassWithProtectedCtor 时出现更长的错误消息）。

原文由 Gabriel Devillers 发布，翻译遵循 CC BY-SA 4.0 许可协议